Chinese Women, Asian Women, Online Dating & Things Chinese and Asian
Born in the UK but now living in Australia, Paul Fox has travelled to many places throughout China. He has seen the lighter side, the darker side, both the gentle and the seedy sides. He documents his experiences and is willing to share them with anyone who wants to listen. He is not afraid to say things exactly how he sees them, and is quite happy to "name and shame" when necessary.
Articles :
Views :
Comments :
Create Time :
This Blog's Articles
Index of Blogs
Index Blog Articles

What The Freak.....?    

By Paul Fox
1828 Views | 40 Comments | 4/22/2019 12:38:12 PM
(Showing 11 to 20 of 40) Previous 1 2 3 4 More...
#2019-04-25 15:21:50 by oldghost @oldghost

@paulfox your 'cutting to the chase' is as clear as congee - pidan zhou!  The mythology of the many 'saviours' is often laughable indeed.  The writings of the disciples of Confucius, the writings of Zhuangzi, Mengzi, Laozi et al are however traceable and fairly verifiable.  What was written or quoted therein may not be, but the writings do indeed exist.  Just as do the words of Plato, Socrates or the writings of Sima Qian. 

I fail to see how your words about the authenticity of a temple relate to a random collection of vaguely interesting English anomalies, nor how a collection of famous men's wives (why do you apostrophise wife/wives?) is in any way relevant.  It seems like a 'random walk' to me! :D

#2019-04-27 16:31:18 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


Why do I aposraphise the 'wives'. I suggest you put on another pair of glasses and take a second look.

Let's just say that I question their 'femininity'.

#2019-04-27 16:35:09 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


Chance and Happenstance are not the same as 'coincidence' - at least I don't believe they are. Early in this blog I mentioned the connections between Lincloln and JFK, but didn't list them. Perhaps I should do just that -

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.

John F Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.

John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.

Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.

Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy.

Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.

Both were assassinated by Southerners.

Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.

Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.

Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.

Both assassins were known by their three names.

Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'

Kennedy was shot in a car called 'Lincoln.'

Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse.

Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.



A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland.

A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.

#2019-04-27 19:21:04 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


There's a lot of truth to the saying, 'What you've never had, you never miss'. As a Westerner in China, we have no access to Google; YouTube, G-mail, Skype, FaceBook, etc, yet when you mention it to a Chinese person they look at you with a blank expression. China is not 'better' than the West; just different. A 'crime' in China means there must be a victim. You can walk the streets naked at 3am and the police will just laugh at you for being stupid. Yet in Western Australia you'll be arrested for drinking beer on the beach; you'll be fined for buying a washing machine, (or other 'white goods') before 11am on a Sunday. Go to a pub that has an outside bar, and sit at a table next to the 'line-in-the-sand' that forms the 'boundary'. If you want to smoke you must cross that 'line', and, while continuing the conversation with whoever is with you, don't pick up your beer, or you'll be arrested for 'street-drinking'. Likewise, take your seat on the other side of that 'line' and try to light-up a cigarette - you'll quickly see how power-mad individuals will 'police' you. This is not 'censorship' - it's INSANITY! A couple of years ago, one of my Chinese students, who had gone to Canada for further study, sent me a message. The text conversation went like this - (him first) "I hate this place!"


"I can't buy beer"

"Well you're only 17"

"I can buy it in China"

"Well you're not in China"

"I hate this place!"

So, on the night BEFORE your 18th birthday, you can not buy alcohol, but tomorrow it's OK. Why? It has nothing to do with 'maturity' - it's all about control - which is censorship. What gives one human being the right to control another? And who says THAT human being has the moral duty to obey or comply? I have an English friend who currently lives in Vietnam. She is 60 years old and is a trained nurse. Despite her practising nursing for 40 years, she is no longer allowed to, because she has not renewed her 'licence'. Once she sends 30 pounds to the UK, her licence will be renewed and she can then continue to work as a nurse. Think about that for a moment. She is no longer 'qualified' because she has not yet handed over 3 bits of brown paper to some 'authority' that rules over her. Can you see how silly this all is? Is she going to be prosecuted for saving someone's life if they've been involved in a potentially fatal accident? Is she going to ignore 40 years of training and experience and let someone die because she hasn't paid fake money to some fake 'god' that somehow gives her 'permission'?

This is censorship on a whole different level.

If you're driving your car and your driving licence has expired, does that affect your ABILITY to drive? Of course not, but you'll be arrested, charged, and fined for committing a 'crime'. Simply hand over some fake bits of paper, and suddenly you become 'qualified' to continue driving.

The word 'insanity' doesn't even come close...............

#2019-04-28 19:19:15 by oldghost @oldghost


again your answer has nothing to do with your original articles. You like to introduce mysticism it seems, or something I do not see.

You question my question about apostropised wives, wife?

Why do I aposraphise the 'wives'. I suggest you put on another pair of glasses and take a second look.The photos below are all 'wives' of ..

Clementine Churchill. 'Wife' of Winston.

David Rockefeller and his 'wife'.

Amal Clooney, 'wife' of George. (Amal, or A Mal(e)?)

Macron's 'wife'

Eleanor Roosevelt, 'wife' of FDR

Ruth Graham, 'wife' of Billy

Melanie Gates, 'wife' of Bill.

bizarre!!! wode tian na!



#2019-04-28 19:26:15 by oldghost @oldghost

Coincidences can be found anywhere you care to look.  To attribute significance to random coincidence is nothing short of silly.  To extend such coincidence perhaps into a hand of god - well what can I say?  Absurd is absurd, risible is risible.  I can be polite but do not need to be respectful.

#2019-04-29 13:20:17 by melcyan @melcyan



"Early in this blog I mentioned the connections between Lincloln and JFK, but didn't list them. Perhaps I should do just that"


Perhaps you should but you didn’t. You listed coincidences instead. You listed coincidences, some a hundred years apart. Is "100 years" special? To a pattern making brain it may look special, but is it really? Why not 99.9 years? Just playing with you Paul. I know that you can see 99.9 is 666 upside down. Anyone who is interested in Paul’s coincidences or"connections" examined for what they really are one by one, just copy and paste his words into a google search. That’s all I have time for today because I need to start cooking my chicken Marilyn or is it chicken Maryland? I always get those two confused.

#2019-04-29 14:50:08 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


I know you love your 666, however it is NOT what most people think, or believe, it to be. The 'meaning' given to it is simply 'fear-porn'.


If a fish spends its life at the bottom of the ocean, it will never see birds flying in the sky.

This 'world' is not what you think it is, nor, it seems, could you ever imagine it being anything beyond the perception you have had all your life, whilst essentially living at the 'bottom of the ocean'.

#2019-04-29 16:57:59 by oldghost @oldghost

Monroe thighs would be the source of many sighs, some 60 years ago.  One would indeed be Merry between them, joyous perhaps as JFK we hear tell was; Mary is almost merry it seems, but the large chicken thigh is definitely Maryland.

#2019-04-29 18:06:00 by oldghost @oldghost

Their femininity?  What scale do you use? So you rate them as questionable? I have already used the word 'bizarre' but it leaps to mind again. You and I reside in different universes (fortunately).  Is there a regulation requiring a certain index value to qualify as female?  So what is your masculinity index, or mine for that matter? I never use the phrase 'no disrespect', and I refrain from it here too. Funny indeed.

(Showing 11 to 20 of 40) Previous 1 2 3 4 More...
To respond to another member's comment type @ followed by their name before your comment, like this: @username Then leave a space. Ask Paul Fox a Question : Click here...