John Abbot asked me write a short blog in response to a question he asked me on Imi's 'Flattards' blog. His question was simple - show me photographs of the 'flat-Earth' with an 'upturned edge'.
Before I 'get into it', ask yourself one simple, yet serious, question.
What could anyone hope to gain by stating that the Earth is 'flat'?
With a budget of around $52 million a DAY, I can think of around 20 BILLION reasons a year why NASA would convince the world we live on a 'spinning ball'.
Since the Sun takes 24 hours to do each rotation, and we're told the Earth is spinning at 1000mph, then there's no escaping the maths insofar as the Earth MUST be 24,000 miles in circumference.
Therefore, the official calculator for working out the Earth's curvature is -
8 inches per mile-squared.
Example -
2 miles would be 2 x 2 x 8 inches = 32 inches
25 miles would be 25 x 25 x 8 inches = 5000 inches, or 416.67 feet.
The longest bridge in the world is the Danyang - Kunshan Bridge, in China. At 165km long (102 miles), there should be a 'drop' of around 7000 feet from one end to the other. (102 x 102 x 8 inches = 83,232 inches, or 6,936 feet.
The longest point-to-point microwave link in the world is 196km, or 122 miles.
Over that distance, the drop, due to 'curvature', should be a little less than 10,000 feet - yet microwaves travel in a dead-straight line.
A challenge has just been uploaded onto YouTube, (link below), and the challenge is a simple one. Show us the 'curve'.
If you check it out, make sure you read the comments below it. People are offering their super-funds, even their houses, to anyone who can demonstrate the Earth's curvature, without using NASA images, etc.
So, back to John's request. The truth is, there's not one single photograph of the Earth from 'space', not one!
There's no demonstrable proof as to whether it's 'flat', or a 'spinning ball'.
Now, before you say, 'Oh, well that's it then', hang on a moment...
There are plenty of extremely high-altitude photographs, none of which show any 'curvature'.
Most of us already know that NASA has never gone to the Moon, that's because it cannot!
Many of us already know that the world was lied to about 9/11.
So there's TWO massive lies to start off with. Why is it so incredible to believe we've not been lied to about the shape of the Earth?
"Oh, well, there's the Sun and Moon, they're 'balls'." Are they? If the Earth is more shaped like a 'disc', why can't the Sun and Moon be discs too?
Anyway, John asked me to make this blog short, so I'll close here and respectfully ask that you look at the enclosed pics before responding.
Pay particular attention to the two pics at the bottom, and ask yourself why the U.N flag is actually a map of the flat Earth.
Here's the link to the challenge -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWDI10I-efg&t=875s
If you can spare 11 minutes of your time, watch this and prepare to have your mind blown!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA1RtZkXyh8
There's also a very powerful interview that anyone who thinks they have an open mind should listen to
https://sageofquayradio.blogspot.com/2018/10/is-earth-really-flat-interview-with.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SageOfQuayRadio+%28Sage+of+Quay+Radio%29
If this is still not enough to at least encourage you to do more research, then maybe you'd be interested in buying my beachfront property in the Kalahari desert, that comes complete with a family of unicorns!
Paul, let's start here. You wrote:
Since the Sun takes 24 hours to do each rotation, and we're told the Earth is spinning at 1000mph, then there's no escaping the maths insofar as the Earth MUST be 24,000 miles in circumference.
Therefore, the official calculator for working out the Earth's curvature is -
8 inches per mile-squared.
What does the word "therefore" relate to?
There is nothing in the information provided before the word "therefore" that demonstrates that "the official calculator for working out the Earth's curvature is - 8 inches per mile-squared."
I am not saying you are wrong about this. Maybe that really is the calculator, but the information you are basing that statement on doesn't appear to support it.
All you've said is that the circumference of Earth is 24,000 miles. How does that alone demonstrate that the calculator is "8 inches per mile squared"?
So please explain where you are getting that calculator from?
I don't necessarily see any merit to the calculator being "8 inches per mile squared". If in one mile the drop is 8 inches, then in 2 miles the drop should be 16 inches. Explain why we would square the result?
I can see valid reasons to question the validity of all of your supposed proofs, but I'm not interested in going through them all here. Convince me on this one first.
@JohnAbbot
Thanks for posting this, and for your response.
The official Earth-curve calculator can easily be found by doing a simple Google search. The word 'therefore' was used quite simply because we're told the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference just because it 'spins' at 1000mph, and 'goes round the Sun' once every 24 hours.
Therefore (I used the word again), since the 'curvature' must be in all directions, (if it's a ball), the mathematical equation for calculating the curve is 8 inches per mile, (squared).
I'm not a mathematician. There's another calculation used which is 0.666 inches per square mile, in all directions. They both work out to be same insofar as they give the same result.
Here's just ONE link to the official Earth-curve calculator.
http://earthcurvature.com/
@paulfox1
"If this is still not enough to at least encourage you to do more research, then maybe you'd be interested in buying my beachfront property in the Kalahari desert, that comes complete with a family of unicorns! "
An interesting, thought provoking blog, thanks Paul.
In relation to your property in the Kalahari Desert, I know you're kidding about the unicorns.
I'm assuming you're using poetic licence when describing it as beachfront, it's most likely beside a nice oasis. I'd be interested to learn though, your cash sale price for the said property - either with or without camels? (think)
Paul,
Just because you cannot usually see manmade satellites with the naked eye does not mean they are not there.
Want to see a satellite with your naked eyes? Watch an 'Iridium Flare'.
Satellite phones use a network of satellites that are named the 'Iridium Satellite Constellation'. They orbit the earth at 27,000 km/hour in a pattern that assures there is ALWAYS at least one Iridium satellite 'overhead'. There are 66 satellites organized into 6 orbits of 11 satellites per orbit. You can see an animated GIF of their orbits here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iridium_Coverage_Animation.gif
Hang in there.... I am going somewhere with this....
The satellites are metallic silver and reflect sunlight. When the angle is correct (between you, a satellite, and the sun) you can see the reflection of the sunlight off an Iridium satellite with the naked eye, and watch it track across the sky from horizon to horizon above you..... There are smart phone apps and web sites that will do the calculations for you. You enter your location and it predicts the next visible Iridium Flare at your location.
I have seen Iridium Flares and have also observed the International Space Station with my naked eye. (There are apps/programs that will predict the next visible pass of the ISS above your location, too.)
About your beach-front desert property... I already live a few miles from the ocean. But, I would be interested in your family of unicorns.....They would be a great gift for the right person. :)
@JoeM65
Hi Joe. Thanks for your reply. You said:-
There are 66 satellites organized into 6 orbits of 11 satellites per orbit.
Do you see a pattern here? (66 6 11) 6 x 11 = 66
No? Well allow me to assist you with a few more 'facts'.
The Earth's 'tilt' is 23.4 degrees from the vertical, which just happens to be 66.6 degrees from the HORIZONtal
The tropics are 66.6 degrees above and below the Equator
The 'curve' is 0.666 inches per sqm in all directions
The Earth 'orbits' the Sun at 66,600 mph
Happenstance? Yes
Chance? Yes
Coincidence? No such thing!
'Satellites' are nothing but ground-based masts (which is why you can't get a phone signal in the countryside)
NASA admits they cannot leave 'low-Earth orbit', (they also admit to 'losing' all the tapes and telemetry data from the 1969 'Moon Landing', but that's for another day).
If there really are 'satellites' up there, then they are very low, and there's certainly not 2271 of them, as Wikipedia would like us to believe.
Go and watch some footage from the IFS (International Fake Stattion) - there's plenty of it available.
I don't profess to know ALL the answers, but after studying this topic for hundreds and hundreds of hours, (including participating in live experiments), I can categorically state one thing - WE DO NOT LIVE ON A SPINNING BALL!
@Barry1
It's 'beachfront' insofar as there are no other buildings between the house and the beach.
Why are you referring to 'a family of camels' when I clearly stated unicorns?
Anyway, it seems @JoeM65 will be taking the unicorns, so it's now a moot point, lol.(rofl)
@ paulfox1
i love how you use science to debunk science
Mathamathics being one of the sciences
and i cant belive @melcyan hasnt picked you up on this
THE EARTH
spins on its Axis doing a complete revolution once every 24 hours = 1 day
THE EARTH
rotates around the sun in an olitpical orbit taking 364.75 days = 1 year
Based on these Assumsions and Your 10,000 MPH could you recaulate the cruviture for me
because I carn't
@roughdiamond
Mathematics is not a science but it is definitely an essential tool of science. The world was very different 200 years ago. It was possible to be "expert" in many different areas at once. At that time Mathematics was defined as a science. It is not defined as a science now.
I have given up trying to have an intelligent discussion about science with Paul. Once all the conspiracy theory talk on CLM has been quarantined to one area I will profile a typical conspiracy theorist, possibly Paul himself and explain why a rational scientific discussion with him is not possible.
@roughdiamond
Hey, dude - not heard from you in a while - thanks for your comment.
You said:-
THE EARTH spins on its Axis doing a complete revolution once every 24 hours = 1 day
My question is simple - How do you know?
Then you said:-
THE EARTH rotates around the sun in an olitpical orbit taking 364.75 days = 1 year
Same question.......
The truth is, you don't - you only BELIEVE what you've been taught. Have you done any research? I guess the answer is no, right?
Then you ask me about the 10,000mph. Where did I mention 10,000 mph?
Then you ask me about MY calculations. If you read my comment to John Abbot, you'll see that they are not MY calculations, but are the official calculations as provided by those master scientists themselves - NASA.
Have you read my book that can be downloaded on my blog callled 'The Devil's Playground'? If not, then please do.
The problem is, my friend, that people are so stuck in their own little 'snowdome' that they don't realise that they have been deceived all their lives. Not just about the shape of the earth, but about everything. When you've seen me write 'everything is a lie', I'm not joking!
Yet to most, I'm just a crazy conspiracy theorist.
I always smile to myself when I think back to how things must have been a few thousand years ago. I imagine the conversation to go something like this;-
"Yo, dude, what are you building?"
"A big boat. It's called an Ark"
"Wow, it's so big. Why are you building it?"
"Because there's a great big flood coming that's going to kill everyone on Earth"
"Yeah, right. You're a nutter, mate!"
So, what's changed?
If people want to think that I am some kind of maniac who loves to 'self-harm' by putting my head on the proverbial 'chopping-block' by writing this stuff, then fine. Everyone has a choice, right?
However, I do this because I care; I do this because I am not only trying to help people, but I'm actually trying to save lives!
It wasn't long ago that @Barry1 was of the same opinion as you, and others. He thought I was going crazy too. It took me well over a year to convince him to take a look at what I was saying, and when he did.......well you've seen his blog, right?
Barry must be close to 1000 hours of research by now. I've done well over 5000 of research. My book doesn't even scratch the surface when it comes to what I now know to be true, but it's a good place to start.
Let me put it in simple terms. What is soon to befall this Earth, (whether it's flat, round, square, or shaped like a pair of testicles), is beyond the comprehension of 90% of the human race. I'm talking BEYOND Biblical proportions!
It's going to make Noah's flood look like a kid's picnic by comparison.
Therefore, as I see it, people have 2 choices. They can either stay fast asleep in their 'coma' and deal with the above when it happens, or they can take some notice of people like myself, Barry, and John, and do some research into what we're saying. That just MAY give them time to prepare. If they choose the first option, and stay 'asleep', then may God have mercy on their soul when what's soon to happen, happens.
One final thought, my friend. I love and respect you, and all I'm doing is asking you to hear what I'm desperately trying to tell people. If you want to think I'm crazy, then fine, but at least do some research first, and THEN call me 'crazy'.
If you haven't read my book, then I'm asking you to do so. It's only 52 pages; it's incredibly easy to read, and it'll take up about an hour of your time. It's really no big deal. That said, it might actually help save the lives you and your loved ones.
If you think that sounds crazy, well think again, my friend. I've never been more serious in my life!
@paulfox1 Arrant nonsense dressed up as crude arithmetic deserves no rebuttal - an eye-roll will do, so that is what this is! 老鬼