Chinese Women, Asian Women, Online Dating & Things Chinese and Asian
Barry from Australia is a questioning soul who looks at social issues from an alternative point of view and instead of asking, “Why?”, he asks “Why not?” He’s convinced that many of his previous incarnations were spent in China. He feels drawn to the people there; attracted by their rich culture and way of life. If given one wish from God, he’d reply, “I want everyone on Earth to be the same colour, speak the same language, and treat each other as they themselves would like to be treated.”
Articles :
Views :
Comments :
Create Time :
This Blog's Articles
Index of Blogs
Index Blog Articles

Dark Shadow of My Life    

By Barry Pittman
4881 Views | 70 Comments | 5/23/2018 11:39:42 AM
(Showing 31 to 40 of 70) Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 More...
#2018-06-02 07:32:37 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


You do this EVERY TIME! 'Show me, show me, show me', and then when I do, you dismiss it because you are intent on dwelling in your own little 'bubble'.

I've 'spoon-fed' you time and time again, but you always say you don't like the 'taste'.

You're too damn lazy, (apathetic), to do your OWN research, because, in your words, you 'just don't care!'

#2018-06-02 12:46:26 by Barry1 @Barry1



Hello Paul.


I watched the YouTube video you submitted and nearly burst out laughing when one of the commentators featured there claimed that Michelle Obama wore a cod piece or some other device to mask her male genitalia!   (rofl)(rofl)


You couldn't make this stuff up - some of it is so damn funny! :):D:D

#2018-06-02 12:54:54 by JohnAbbot @JohnAbbot

@Barry1 - I don't understand why @paulfox1 provided that long, boring video of Alex Jones talking. You can find lots of videos on YouTube on the subject, although being YouTube (aka Google), you can bet they do their best to steer you away from the truth with all sorts of irrelevant links. But here are a few of the best of them:

Obama refers to Michelle as Michael

Here he calls "her" Mike, then stumbles again, then says Michelle

This one is just a funny video, But really, look at "her".

There are lots of videos where Michelle flashes her junk, but this one is the most obvious I've seen.

Although here is another video which clearly shows Michael's junk. The entire video is dedicated to showing that Michelle really is Michael, but the junkshot is at minute 16:08.

Does it matter if Michelle is really Michael? Not on a personal level.

What does matter is that they lied about it to the American public. They subverted the election of the President of the United States through a complete subterfuge of who he really is, and that is unforgivable, and likely grounds for a lengthy time in prison.

#2018-06-02 17:20:50 by Barry1 @Barry1



Thanks to John for pointing out relevant TouTube videos re gender issues concerning Michelle Obama.


I watched all of these and evidence was presented that Michelle possessed definitive masculine characteristics. Things such as relative finger size, head size, shoulder width, Adam's apple, shoulder and arm musculature, etc.


Then there are certain videos and camera stills that appear to show that Michelle has a penis. The problem with videos and camera shots though is that experts at photoshop can create almost anything they want to. They can distort and bend reality. So sadly, camera shots showing Michelle with a penis could have been doctored by a mischievous video image expert and then covertly released to the world as a type of distasteful prank (or worse).


However, one cannot deny the physical characteristics of Michelle as mentioned above.  On medical and physical grounds, she (he) clearly is more male than female.


So I must apologise to @paulfiox1 for initially scoffing at the idea. It seems that with additional evidence presented by John, that Paul is correct.


This means that Barack Obama is homosexual. As is Michelle.


Does it matter?  No.  It doesn't matter at all to me.  Though as John pointed out, it's the DECEPTION that matters.


Whilst on the subject of conspiracies, let me say that I believe also that the moon landings were faked.  Here are three reasons.


1. The USA in the 60s was at the height of a Cold War with the USSR.  President Kennedy in 1961 had promised the world that before the end of the decade, the US would land on the moon. So to save face and also in a massive psychological win against Russia, a well executed albeit fake "moon landing" was professionally executed.


2. Under the moon lander itself whilst on the moon, photos show none of the fine dust below the 10,000 pound landing rockets was disturbed.  A scientific impossibility. Unless it was in a film studio.


3.  One of the astronauts described hearing the "roaring propulsion engine" inside the landing capsule. Another astronaut said it was deathly quiet, because there's no sound in space.  How could two alleged astronauts have such diametrically opposed versions of the same trip?

Much other evidence could also be cited to illustrate the moon landings were skilfully faked. So what else out there that most folks accept as bona fide, has also been faked?


Food for thought, yes?  :^)




#2018-06-02 17:35:48 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


I provided that long, boring video of Alex Jones because, quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of trawling the Internet in order to find something that @Barry1 might take notice of.

That aside, thanks for providing the links above, and for telling Barry your thoughts on Michael, which I totally concur with. The American people were lied to.......yet AGAIN !, however, there's about as much chance of Obama going to prison as there is of Donald Trump 'draining the swamp' !

#2018-06-02 20:30:33 by paulfox1 @paulfox1


It's what you do, Barry......

You laughed and scoffed when I mentioned 'Michael', yet now @JohnAbbot has provided you with irrefutable proof, you'll just accept it and say that you 'don't care' that we're lied to about everything.

Something to ponder.......

According to the Red Cross, and also the Almanac of World Religions, in 1933 there were 15.3 million Jewish people in the world. In 1948, there were 15.7 million. That's an INCREASE of 400,000 over a 15-year period.

Maybe the Red Cross and the Almanac of World Religions are wrong, and your 'his story' book is right?....................or maybe it's just another f*ckin' lie?

Either way, you just don't care, right?



#2018-06-03 17:29:54 by Barry1 @Barry1



Paul, this blog is about a dark period of my life when I had a temper problem.

I believe now there's a good chance that Michelle and Barack Obama are most likely both homosexuals, having apparently deceived most of the world for many years as to their status. This is enough of a shock for me for one day.  Or one week. 


Talking about the Holocaust where about six million Jews were exterminated in World War 2 is a whole other matter.  With the greatest of respect, I suggest this blog is perhaps not the most appropriate place for a discussion on this very important issue.


Once again, may I suggest you start your own YouTube channel with your ideas?  Over time, you'd build up a dedicated bunch of followers.  This website is primarily devoted to issues concerning Western men dating Chinese ladies. So as intriguing as many of your notions are, to give full respect to John Abbot, the owner of this website, discussion of wildly non-mainstream topics unrelated to Chinese dating, should be given the coverage that they rightfully deserve, elsewhere.  On a specialised YouTube channel run by yourself.  Call it something like,

"Paul Fox - Thunder From Downunder,

Where the TRUTH Is Revealed!"  :^)


#2018-06-04 09:52:15 by roughdiamond @roughdiamond


argh i have truly missed you you blithering old hypocrite

#2018-06-04 11:12:03 by JohnAbbot @JohnAbbot

@Barry1 - a couple of things:

1. It is true that experts could fake those images of Michelle's apparent junk, but equally true is that experts could examine and discern if the shots were faked. So far, as near as I can tell, no such experts have come forward and refuted the images being real. I believe the reason they haven't is because the images are real.

I also believe that the reason the Obama machine hasn't tried to refute them is because it would end up in being a highly charged public debate in which the originators of the images could easily come forward and prove the images are real. The Obamas know they are real, so they are letting sleeping dogs lay.

2. I agree with you that Paul should start his own site or some other venue where he presents his arguments to the world at large. I am not sure that YouTube by itself is the best plan. Every post on YouTube must include a video, and that is not a small task. It would be nigh on impossible for Paul to create and post a video everyday IMHO.  However, there are many possible places where Paul could set up a blog which he could supplement with a YouTube channel. 

Such locations as Blogger (aka BlogSpot - Google owned), Tumblr, Wix and many others would allow Paul 5 or 6 posts per week, some short, some detailed, and could be supplemented by posting a video every couple of weeks on YouTube. The video could be included in an article on his blogs, which would be done through a link to YouTube. 

He does have to do everything he can to keep his blogs "on topic" if he wants to get traffic to them from the search engines. In other words, stick to topics relevant to Illuminati, Global Elite, New World Order, Flat Earth, etc. Don't start writing about Chinese women or online dating or any other irrelevant matters, because they will drag you down with the search engines.

Once Paul had developed a substantial readership he could then move to his own, self hosted blog/website and have his readers follwo him over to that site.

#2018-06-04 15:12:13 by Barry1 @Barry1




"It is true that experts could fake those images of Michelle's apparent junk, but equally true is that experts could examine and discern if the shots were faked. So far, as near as I can tell, no such experts have come forward and refuted the images being real. I believe the reason they haven't is because the images are real."


The plot thickens.  Please take a look at 1 minute, 34 seconds (94 seconds)  into the following YouTube video, "15 Things You Didn't Know About Michelle Obama".


It shows Michelle Obama in tights performing an exercise regime on the floor.  Because she's wearing skin-hugging tights, one can clearly discern there is NO PENIS.


This is in direct contradiction to other YouTube videos such as at:


Can anyone explain this glaring anomaly?  Or do you believe that this is evidence that Michelle's "penis" may in fact be a product of photoshop image tampering?


I'm serious.  One YouTube video clearly shows female genitalia. The other ones show male genitalia.  What's going on here?   :^)

(Showing 31 to 40 of 70) Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 More...
To respond to another member's comment type @ followed by their name before your comment, like this: @username Then leave a space. Ask Barry Pittman a Question : Click here...